Our Work

On July 30, SDRI Legal Director Danielle Friedman spoke with Bob Bauer on Executive Functions. They discussed state criminal statutes that could apply to federal deployment of military or ICE and examine the limits of executive authority in the context of potential federal interference ahead of the November midterms.

This explainer aims to shed light on existing state laws criminalizing election-related misconduct and their potential application to curb improper actions by federal government officials. This explainer focuses on those provisions of state election codes that criminalize behavior that experts anticipate the federal government may engage in during the November elections in 2026. Part I describes the role of the federal government in elections, including the federal laws that prohibit certain behaviors by federal officials. Part II then explores the parallel provisions in state law, specifically noting the different types of state laws that may apply to anticipated federal activities. Part III then considers what states can do to educate officials about these laws and deter potential interference by federal actors. Finally, Part IV addresses enforcement-related issues and likely legal responses from the federal government.

"Danielle Friedman, legal director at the University of Wisconsin Law School’s State Democracy Research Initiative, highlighted several ways the bill would affect voting in Wisconsin."

"President Trump recently called for Republicans to “nationalize” the midterm elections, while the U.S. Department of Justice is suing dozens of states for access to voter rolls and reiterating unproven election claims. A legal expert and a former Congressman from Wisconsin weigh in."