Skip to main content

Our Work

The State Democracy Research Initiative works to produce high-quality research and share its findings and insights with the public, press, advocates, scholars, and judges. This work takes a variety of forms, from timely commentary to comprehensive overviews of all 50 states to forward-looking legal analysis.

Interactive Sites

All Resources and Publications

In the Media

Wisconsin Examiner: US DOJ says ICE won’t comply with Milwaukee mask ban, rebukes mayor

07.10.26

"The Justice Department rejected Milwaukee’s attempts to prohibit immigration agents from wearing masks in a Friday letter to Milwaukee Mayor Cavalier Johnson and City Attorney Evan Goyke." (References SDRI Research).

In the Media

Houston Chronicle: Can Houston officials investigate Lorenzo Salgado Araujo’s death? Yes, but it would be complicated.

Bryna Godar 07.09.26

"In the days since a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent shot and killed Lorenzo Salgado Araujo in east Houston, community leaders, residents and officials from nearly every corner of the city have called for an independent investigation into the shooting."

In the Media

Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Is it legal for ICE agents to ignore Milwaukee's no-mask ordinance?

Rob Yablon 07.07.26

"In February - in the wake of federal agents shooting and killing two Minneapolis residents - Milwaukee council members were defiant."

In the Media

Bolts: This Maine Lawsuit is Testing the Boundaries of Suing Federal Immigration Agents

"Federal law makes it very difficult to file lawsuits against federal officers, but some states have adopted their own laws to give people a so-called cause of action to sue."

In the Media

The Atlantic: The Death of Renee Good Has Yet to Be Properly Investigated

Bryna Godar 07.06.26

"Nearly six months have passed since federal officers shot and killed Renee Good and Alex Pretti on the streets of Minneapolis. No one has been arrested, the Trump administration has provided no reason to believe that any serious investigation is taking place, and federal officials continue to stonewall state and local investigators in Minnesota."

In the Media

CEB: Can Individuals Sue the Federal Government for Constitutional Rights Violations? Con Law Scholars Weigh In on California's Proposed 'No Kings Act'

"A recently proposed California bill would create a new avenue for individuals seeking relief for constitutional rights violations by federal officials. The proposal – which cleared the state Senate in a 30-10 vote and is currently pending in the Assembly Appropriations Committee – is part of a broader national trend, with similar legislation proposed in Illinois, New York and Connecticut."

Amicus Briefs

United States v. New York et al.

06.17.26

On June 17, 2026, the State Democracy Research Initiative’s faculty co-directors, Miriam Seifter and Rob Yablon, filed an amicus brief with six other legal scholars in United States v. New York et al., a case before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The appeal concerns whether the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution bars New York’s “Protect Our Courts Act” and several executive orders that limit state cooperation with federal immigration enforcement.

In the Media

PBS Wisconsin: Bryna Godar on a lawsuit over immigration holds in Wisconsin

Bryna Godar 06.01.26

"University of Wisconsin Law School State Democracy Research Initiative attorney Bryna Godar explains a lawsuit against five county sheriffs in the state over the legal status of 48-hour ICE detainers."

In the Media

MS Now: What happens if federal agents trample YOUR rights?

"Over the course of months, from coast to coast, MS Now searched for answers and it became more clear that US Citizens don’t have much if any recourse when their rights are violated by Federal Agents. We followed LA native, Andrea Velez who is a US Citizen that was on her way to work last June when she was caught up in an ICE surge and detained for several days. Her charges were dropped but the experience has had lasting effects. We followed her to DC where she spoke alongside other US Citizens who have been in similar situations and hope to hold federal agents accountable. Legal experts we spoke to on this topic explain how the current administration has been a real stress test on these policies."

Reports

How Can States Address Federal Hostility to Mail Voting?

Derek Clinger 05.28.26 Last Updated 07.14.26

Mail voting is under unprecedented federal pressure heading into the 2026 midterm elections. From the White House to the Supreme Court to Congress, a series of developments is threatening a form of voting that tens of millions of Americans rely on—and that was relatively uncontroversial until just a few years ago. This explainer examines how mail voting became a partisan battleground, what the current federal threats mean for mail voting, and what states, election officials, and advocates can do in response.

Get in touch with our team about our research and work.

Connect