Skip to main content

Our Work

The State Democracy Research Initiative works to produce high-quality research and share its findings and insights with the public, press, advocates, scholars, and judges. This work takes a variety of forms, from timely commentary to comprehensive overviews of all 50 states to forward-looking legal analysis.

Interactive Sites

All Resources and Publications

Commentary

State Court Report: Scholarship Roundup: September 2024 Back to School Edition

New articles and books cover a wide range of topics related to state constitutions, judiciaries, state-level democracy, and more, as of September 2024.

In the Media

Wisconsin Public Radio: Land trusts to seek more Stewardship funds after state Supreme Court decision

"Land conservation groups say they expect to see more funding requests under the state’s land purchase program now that the Legislature’s finance committee can’t legally block conservation projects. At the same time, Republican lawmakers say the decision has placed the future of the program in jeopardy. The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled 6-1 earlier this month that certain statutes governing the Knowles-Nelson Stewardship Program unconstitutionally authorize the legislative committee to block spending of funds the full Legislature had already earmarked for land purchases."

In the Media

KQED: Doing Democracy: Activists Look to State Courts and Constitutions to Expand Rights

"As part of our “Doing Democracy” series, we look at state courts and constitutions. Each state has its own constitution, and they generally offer more rights than the U.S. Constitution. For example, the California constitution guarantees the right to happiness, reproductive freedom, and the ability to fish on public land, among other enumerated rights. With a conservative majority on the U.S. Supreme Court, activists are increasingly looking at states to protect – and even expand – rights. But will this strategy work? We’ll talk to legal experts about how state courts and constitutions are increasingly becoming battle grounds for preserving or expanding civil rights, and what the impact in California and neighboring states might be."

In the Media

The New Yorker: Can State Supreme Courts Preserve—or Expand—Rights?

"State constitutions offer a potential counterweight to these trends. They embody what the law professors Miriam Seifter and Jessica Bulman-Pozen have termed “the democracy principle”—a commitment to popular sovereignty that is reflected in language vesting power in the people and in explicit assurances of the right to vote."

Commentary

State Court Report: Scholarship Roundup: End of Semester Edition

Recent articles address states taking policy questions away from courts, standing in election cases, and state shadow dockets from the 2023-2024 academic year.

Articles & Essays

Standing for Elections in State Courts

Adam Sopko & Miriam Seifter 04.25.24 Last Updated 11.21.24

This Article explores the role of standing doctrine in the future of state-court election litigation. Building on existing state practices and state constitutional principles, we defend a presumptively broad approach to state-court standing in election law cases, which we term simply election standing. We find that most state courts already relax standing to some extent in election cases—an approach that reflects both the flexible power of state courts and state constitutions’ commitment to democracy. State courts may be the best (and only) fora able to resolve pressing election-related disputes, and in turn to foster certainty, finality, and confidence in election outcomes.

In the Media

AP: A crush of lawsuits over voting in multiple states is creating a shadow war for the 2024 election

"As President Joe Biden and Donald Trump step up their campaigning in swing states, a quieter battle is taking place in the shadows of their White House rematch. The Republican National Committee, newly reconstituted under Trump, has filed election-related lawsuits in nearly half the states. Recent lawsuits over voter roll maintenance in Michigan and Nevada are part of a larger strategy targeting various aspects of voting and election administration."

In the Media

Wisconsin Watch: Wisconsin Supreme Court could further reshape balance of power in Capitol

"The Wisconsin Supreme Court will hear oral arguments Wednesday in a lawsuit that could further alter the balance of power in Wisconsin state government. The case, brought by Gov. Tony Evers against the GOP chairs of three legislative committees, seeks to limit the Legislature’s ability to throw out certain policy decisions made by state executive branch agencies. Evers filed the lawsuit directly with the state Supreme Court. "

Commentary

State Court Report: Scholarship Roundup: That's a Wrap on 2023

New publications on state public law focus on topics ranging from constitutional conventions to criminal sentencing published in the latter part of 2023.

Articles & Essays

Wisconsin Law Review Special Issue 2023: “Public Law in the States”

This year, states have stepped into the spotlight. The Supreme Court’s opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization has focused attention on the state role in defining individual rights, while democracy cases like Moore v. Harper have underscored the important state role in elections. In addition, many high-profile issues are being brought directly to voters through state ballot measures. As state institutions take center stage, state-focused scholarship has never been more timely or important.

Get in touch with our team about our research and work.

Connect