The Kansas Supreme Court has held that partisan gerrymandering claims present nonjusticiable political questions under the state constitution. Adopting the reasoning of Rucho to reach this conclusion, the court observed that “neither the Kansas Constitution, state statutes, nor [the Kansas Supreme Court’s] existing body of caselaw supply judicially discoverable and manageable standards” that can guide a court in resolving partisan gerrymandering claims. Rivera v. Schwab, 512 P.3d 168, 184, 187 (Kan. 2022), cert. denied sub nom. Alonzo v. Schwab, 143 S. Ct. 1055 (2023). In concluding partisan gerrymandering claims are nonjusticiable, the court contrasted Kansas with other “states having codified a constitutional duty to prohibit partisan gerrymandering.” Id. at 186.